Re: [Classicrendezvous] C+ Design Classics

(Example: Bike Shops:R.E.W. Reynolds)

Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 17:49:23 -0700
To: Jerry Moos <>, Hilary Stone <>
From: "Joseph Bender-Zanoni" <>
Subject: Re: [Classicrendezvous] C+ Design Classics
Cc: Dale Brown <>, Classic Rendezvous <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>


What about C+ issuing a compendium of the no longer available design classics?

Joe Bender-Zanoni

At 02:36 PM 10/17/00 -0400, Jerry Moos wrote:
>Thanks for the list, Hilary, pity the Hetchins, Baines and Bates back issues
>are no longer available. Perhaps someone can scan these reviews and Dale (with
>permission from C+) can post them on the site, when he is able to update it
>again. As C+82 appears to be the earliest issue listed, may I assume that the
>Design Classics feature was introduced less than 3 years ago, rather than at
>the inception of Cycling Plus?
>Jerry Moos
>Hilary Stone wrote:
>> The following is a list of the most relevant Design Classics to the Classic
>> Rendezvous list.
>> Alan Cyclocross C+99
>> Baines Gate C+96
>> Bastide C+94
>> Bates Cantiflex C+90
>> Cinelli Super Corsa C+88
>> Claud-Butler SWB tandem C+101
>> Dursley Pedersen C+91
>> Ephgrave C+100
>> Hetchins Curly (written by Ray Etherton) C+82
>> Michaux Boneshaker C+108
>> Moulton AM C+107
>> Paris Galibier C+103
>> Raleigh Chopper C+93
>> Raleigh Lenton C+87
>> Raleigh Record Ace C+105
>> Raleigh X frame C+98
>> Sunbeam C+86
>> Thanet Silverlight C+95
>> Velocar C+102
>> Viscount Aerospace C+110
>> C+100 onwards are available as back issues. They can be ordered with a
>> credit card by ringing 00 44 (0)1458 271111. Perhaps some American members
>> who have the earlier C+s can help out those in the US with copies?
>> Regards
>> Hilary Stone
>> >From: Jerry Moos <>
>> >
>> > Since some of us first subscribed to Cycling Plus after many of the
>> > classic British marques had already been profiled in Design Classics, I
>> > wonder if Hilary might list the past issues in which some of the most
>> > notable of these marques appeared along with advice as to the
>> > possibliity of ordering the back issues in question.