Re: [Classicrendezvous] Re: Frame tubing & chrome

(Example: Racing:Jacques Boyer)

Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 13:21:37 -0600
From: "PeterGrenader" <peterg@ixpres.com>
To: Richard Rose <rmrose@toast.net>, Jerry Moos <moos@penn.com>, dave bohm <davebohm@azstarnet.com>, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [Classicrendezvous] Re: Frame tubing & chrome
References: <E13lwCf-0005zt-00@counter.tesco.net> <001c01c0392d$9aafd4e0$2b24c5a9@davebohm> <39EDF6F0.24520F4C@penn.com> <000c01c039a3$8a9384f0$1801a8c0@normandassociates.com> <39EDF59E.46C1DF99@ixpres.com>


Btw....just checked the site - it's a $600 upcharge, not $500.

- p.g.

PeterGrenader wrote:
> I'm probably gonna get shot for this, but a good friend of mine has a
> Waterford with stainless lugs. It's a beautiful bike, it is. But I cannot
> imagine for the life of me why the addition of stainless lugs (which appear
> naked only at the headtube and are not all that finished) should constitute a
> $500 upcharge. After he saw the frame the owner was a bit shocked as well,
> let me tell ya.
>
> Richard Rose wrote:
>
> > Jerry, you might be interested in taking a look @ Waterford's website. They
> > are offering a stainless steel (polished), option on their frames @ a
> > $500.00 upcharge! Looks real nice too. Also, they have quite a bit of
> > technical info regarding the tubes used in their bikes - real proponents of
> > 853 I might add. I do not think that anyone would accuse Waterford of not
> > making a quality product made to last indefinitely or for following "fads"
> > for that matter.
> > Cheers,
> > Richard Rose (Toledo, Ohio)
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Jerry Moos <moos@penn.com>
> > To: dave bohm <davebohm@azstarnet.com>
> > Cc: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 3:16 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Classicrendezvous] Re: Frame tubing & chrome