Re: [Classicrendezvous] SL vs. old Record seatposts was[Other Campy Mysteries]


Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 20:02:09 -0800
From: Chuck Schmidt <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
To: Richard M Sachs <richardsachs@juno.com>
CC: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [Classicrendezvous] SL vs. old Record seatposts was[Other Campy Mysteries]
References: <20001128.213326.-190351.12.richardsachs@juno.com>


Richard M Sachs wrote:
>
> chuck.
> so you're saying that the catalog 16 was followed
> by a catalog 16 supplement?! where does catalog 17a
> come in? it's got cooler stuff than plain 'ole catalog 17,
> that bad boy with the spiral job. but logic would dictate
> that it followed it, not preceeded it. are there any other
> 'printed pieces' between catalog 16 and the white album,
> oh, i mean catalog 18?
> and what about super DUPER record?
> e-RICHIE

OKay e-Richie, tell the truth... you never did go to my website and actually read the Campagnolo Timeline did you >:-(

The questions to all your answers...errrr...I mean, the answers to your dreams...well, maybe not...what I mean to say is, that it is all there in the Timeline (contributors: Gabe Konrad, Frank Berto, Ron Sheperd, Dave Walker, Dale Brown, and Chuck Schmidt).

Always looking for more contributors...

Chuck Schmidt South Pasadena, California http://www.velo-retro.com (Campy Timeline on site)