Re: [CR]Meaning of "G" (as in good condition used)?

(Example: Framebuilding)

From: "Aldo Ross" <swampmtn@siscom.net>
To: "Mark Bulgier" <mark@bulgier.net>
Cc: <Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <C102531FB711D411B5B90060B0A4687605E501@MAIL>
Subject: Re: [CR]Meaning of "G" (as in good condition used)?
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 08:16:26 -0500


Hi, Mark.

That chainring is what we used to call "beyond the grave" ie poor to very poor. Not worth the shipping charges. I'd send it back.

Aldo Ross


----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Bulgier
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2001 3:04 AM
Subject: [CR]Meaning of "G" (as in good condition used)?



> Hey all,
>
> I'm kinda new to the marketplace of vintage stuff, and I was wondering if
> there were commonly agreed-on definitions for the conditions of used stuff,
> especially G and VG.
>
> This is prompted by me receiving a used chainring I bought unseen. It was
> listed as "G" and I thought that meant in good riding shape, but it's got
> such worn teeth that I suspect few on this list would ride it.
>
> I'd appreciate it if those of you with some extra time on your hands would
> go look at http://bulgier.net/pics/Our_Pics/Bike/WornRing.jpg and tell me
> what you think - am I too picky, or would you consider sending it back?
> Seller charged $20, which is a good enough deal for a SR 42 ring with miles
> left on it - would you ride it?
>
> It's not a big deal, this is more out of curiosity about what other people's
> expectations are.
>
> Mark Bulgier
> Seattle, WA USA