Re: [CR]Campy 36* 4x

(Example: Production Builders:Cinelli:Laser)

Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 08:11:35 -0500
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
From: "Jeff Slotkin" <jeffslotkin@home.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Campy 36* 4x
In-Reply-To: <000b01c0b25a$31592360$1c29b018@vncvr1.wa.home.com>
References: <20010321205105.9973.qmail@web903.mail.yahoo.com> <3AB92C35.7FB12DEC@fridayscomputer.com>


At 02:56 PM 3/21/2001 -0800, Diane Feldman wrote:
>Come to think of it, when you take a narrow light clincher rim, such as
>Mavic Reflex, and peel the beads off of it, there's probably less substance
>left than a tubular rim in the gl330/Arc en Ciel weight range.
>David Feldman

But those beads add structure, so why compare the theoretical strength of rims this way?
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Steve Freides" <steve@fridayscomputer.com>
>To: "Tom Dalton" <tom_s_dalton@yahoo.com>
>Cc: "sterling peters" <sterlingcapital@mail.com>;
><classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2001 2:33 PM
>Subject: Re: [CR]Campy 36* 4x
>
>
> > What means "race rims" in this context? I do lots of everyday riding on
> > these and even lighter rims and they're quite durable, IMO.

Jeff Slotkin
TheLocalSpoke
Goose Creek, SC