RE: [CR]Re: Pinnacle?(or Worst Component?)

(Example: Events:Cirque du Cyclisme:2002)

From: "Moos, Jerry" <jmoos@urc.com>
To: "'RALEIGH531@aol.com'" <RALEIGH531@aol.com>, Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: RE: [CR]Re: Pinnacle?(or Worst Component?)
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 12:59:24 -0500


Yes, I agree that the shifters were the weakest-performing part of the NR gruppo (if you classify cracks in the cranks as a durability rather than a performance issue). Particularly annoying is their tendency to slip into a higher gear while climbing out of the saddle. I finally had to replace the shifters on my wife all-NR Windsor Pro with C-Record era Campy retrofrictions because of that. Simplex Criterium friction shifters (the all-alloy ones, not the cheap plastic ones) are actually better than Campy NR in this respect.

Regards,

Jerry Moos

-----Original Message----- From: RALEIGH531@aol.com [mailto:RALEIGH531@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 10:53 AM To: Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org Subject: Re: [CR]Re: Pinnacle?(or Worst Component?)

In a message dated 3/28/01 10:19:17 AM EST, tom_s_dalton@yahoo.com writes:
> Ummm... I think we may be talking about two different
> products. Tom, No, but my post was a little vague. I was referring to the old Campy friction levers, nice to look at but certainly kept around longer than was warranted. As nice as most of Campagnolo's parts were finished and functioned the levers are a weak link. Having made suitable arrangements (Suntour ratchets), all of mine will soon be sleeping in their baggies.

Pete Geurds
Douglassville, PA