Re: [CR]Lambert

(Example: Framebuilding)

Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 10:34:50 -0700
To: "Moos, Jerry" <jmoos@urc.com>, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
From: "Joseph Bender-Zanoni" <jfbender@umich.edu>
Subject: Re: [CR]Lambert
In-Reply-To: <ABC4A5183996D411BF92000629EEABAD366274@mail-server.urc.com>


Carefully measure the diameter of the axle. I may have a tapered axle for you if you can live with a titanium one! The untapered axle setup will not hold up to much use. We machined tapered axles at the shop I worked at to solve the problems. The BB is not threaded except on the very earliest Lamberts, which had a conventional BB. Another BB solution is the Edco eccentric or the Mavic which do not depend on threads. I do not think threading to Italian is a good idea as the shell is not very thick if I remember.

The first derailleurs I remember were steel Suntour copies which resulted in a lawsuit. Suntour ferociously protected the slant pantograph until the patent expired. On that issue, does anyone know if the Nivex works at a slant? It looks like it might in the Data Book.

Joe Bender-Zanoni Remembering my brief experience selling Lamberts with trepidation

At 09:17 AM 4/20/01 -0400, Moos, Jerry wrote:
>I just bought a Lambert Grand Prix frame and death fork from the CR
>classified page. It's a lugged steel one, purple and white with gold lined
>lugs. The seller included many original parts from this and another frame,
>so the bike is maybe 75% complete. The rear derailleur is steel,
>medium-long cage, simple parallelogram rather like a Huret Svelto. Is this
>an original Lambert derailleur? It also appears to have the infamous
>Lambert BB with untapered axle. I've never owned a Lambert before, so maybe
>someone can enlighten me. Is this BB threaded or is it pressed in as it
>appears it may be? I have only the left arm, anyone have a Lambert right
>arm for sale? Failing that, anyone know if a normal BB or normal axle can
>be installed to allow use of another crank?

>

>Regards,

>

>Jerry Moos