Re: [CR]was - Need a New Bike every 5 years ? Now - Need? Who said need?

(Example: Framebuilding:Tubing)

Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 06:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Tom Dalton" <tom_s_dalton@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]was - Need a New Bike every 5 years ? Now - Need? Who said need?
To: Jeff Slotkin <jeffslotkin@home.com>
Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.20010724081819.00b51958@mail.gscrk1.sc.home.com>


> I'm too young to be nostalgic! I bought mine to
> ride.

That's my point. Buy the new stuff that most appeals to you and ride it. If you keep it nice, keep it period-correct, and retire it before it's dead, you might have a nice showpiece later. But that's just my approach. You could always ride your modern bikes to death and purchase a whole fleet of vintage bikes as collectables. But don't your bikes start to have more importance to you after you've spent many miles in the saddle?


--- Jeff Slotkin wrote:


> At 09:45 AM 7/23/2001 -0700, Tom Dalton wrote:
> > > An odd sentiment to express on this list !
> >
> > To my mind, a
> >limited production, up-to-the minute, top-end bike
> has
> >far more potential to be an interesting collectable
> >than a new bike purchased today as a nostalgia
> piece.
> >In other words, twenty years from now Colnago C40
> with
> >9-speed Dura Ace will be a lot more interesting
> than a
> >Rivendell with a bunch of retro Bobish bits.
>
> I'm too young to be nostalgic! I bought mine to
> ride.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Classicrendezvous mailing list
> Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> http://www.bikelist.org/mailman/listinfo/classicrendezvous

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/