Re: [CR]RE: Masi vs. Waterford

(Example: Component Manufacturers:Cinelli)

From: "Thomas Rawson" <twrawson@worldnet.att.net>
To: "kevin weitzel" <kevinsbikes@netzero.net>
Cc: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <LPBBKANPIJMFBLJNNHCLKEIJCDAA.kevinsbikes@netzero.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]RE: Masi vs. Waterford
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 08:30:51 -0700


Kevin,

Couple questions: "Both frames are of noted quality" - are they equal in this regard?

"but only one the desirability and history" - get the history part but where'd you get the desriability part? Why?

Latter essence of original question.
Thanks
Tom Rawson
Oakland, CA


----- Original Message -----
From: kevin weitzel
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 12:54 AM
Subject: [CR]RE: Masi vs. Waterford



> This is very easy. Both are frames of noted quality. But only one the
> desirability and history: Masi. A matter of fact, mine would be race red
> in color with a complete Record-10 group with Shamal wheels. Let me put it
> this way. The Chrysler 300M is a great car, but damn, wouldn't you rather
> have a Mercedes?!?! History... both racing and quality.
>
>
> Kevin "I may just take a hammer to a French bike just for a smile" Weitzel
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> NetZero Platinum
> Sign Up Today - Only $9.95 per month!
> http://my.netzero.net/s/signup?r=platinum&refcd=PT97