Re: CR parts ratings call for action! was Re: [CR] "Mint"

(Example: Racing:Beryl Burton)

Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:08:14 -0800 (PST)
From: "Fred Rafael Rednor" <fred_rednor@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: CR parts ratings call for action! was Re: [CR] "Mint"
To: Richard M Sachs <richardsachs@juno.com>, questor@cinci.rr.com
Cc: Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
In-Reply-To: <20011126.143713.-160711.1.richardsachs@juno.com>


> You don't spend rare coins and you don't post > mail with rare stamps. If a part is shopworn and also > listed as mint, it will still perform its function as > if it just arrived from the factory. Richard, If coins/stamps aren't related closely enough to bicycles for your tastes, how about cameras? In fact, I'm sure I was on a camera auction Web site when I noticed the rating system that I think would best apply to classic bicycle stuff. In that system (as with every system I've seen used to seriously grade a collectable item) Mint meant unused and essentially perfect cosmetically. NIB is a specialization of Mint - i.e. unused and in the original packaging. There was a Near Mint category for items that are unused but with _very_ mild blemishes. I suppose that the Simplex derailleur which prompted this discussion would be considered Near Mint. No doubt a shop worn but unused item will function as well as a cosmetically perfect one. But cosmetic damage (that's what shop wear is) reduces the value of any item. Otherwise why should a manufacturer even bother to package items like cranksets so as to prevent scratches during transit? Best regards, Fred Rednor - Arlington, Virginia

__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities.yahoo.com/ps/info1