Re: [CR]Campy NR tandem crank question

(Example: Framebuilders:Brian Baylis)

Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 11:49:24 -0400
From: "Steve Freides" <steve@fridayscomputer.com>
Organization: Friday's Computer.com
To: GPVB1@cs.com
Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]Campy NR tandem crank question
References: <fe.877d102.2871be4e@cs.com>


People have simply retapped, with reverse threading, and gotten useable results. Obviously inferior in terms of the strength of the threads but it has been done.

"Helicoil" is a brand new for a threaded insert - the pedal hole is drilled out, the insert with reverse threaded installed, and off you go. That's what I ride.

-S-

GPVB1@cs.com wrote:
>
> In a message dated 7/1/01 10:12:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> steve@fridayscomputer.com writes:
>
> > I have never heard of Campy tandem cranks in 172.5. Can anyone confirm
> > these were made this way and not redrilled or helicoiled single-bike
> > cranks?
> >
> > Steve "rides 172.5 helicoiled cranks on my tandem" Freides
> >
> >
> >
>
> Hi Steve:
>
> We've covered this issue before. Campy made any length in tandem cranks, but
> you had to order it. My other set is 165 / 167.5!!
>
> This is a factory-made tandem set - the arms with the reverse threading have
> the "S" and "D" stamped in them - how could you tap a reverse thread of the
> same diameter into something BTW?

>

> Cheers,

>

> Greg