Re: [CR]Track ENDS/Nutted Fasteners

(Example: Production Builders)

From: "feldman" <feldmanbike@yahoo.com>
To: "Terence Shaw" <terence@shawscycles.com>, "Tom Dalton" <tom_s_dalton@yahoo.com>, "Warren & Elizabeth" <warbetty@sympatico.ca>
Cc: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <B8C88108.1874%terence@shawscycles.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Track ENDS/Nutted Fasteners
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 20:55:39 -0800


Also, about how tight which fastening system holds a wheel in--the holding power of quick releases could be overestimated if you're too impressed with how much a tightened qr compresses the bearings in a hub. A quick release pushes all of the parts involved together but wouldn't a sold axle with nuts be pulling them slightly apart? Classic content--the compressing effect of a qr makes Maxicars and original Mavic SSC hubs look like an even better design job considering they both can have bearing load adjusted when the wheel is in a bike and the skewer is locked--Campagnolo only caught up with that one three years ago!
David Feldman
Vancouver, WA


----- Original Message -----
From: Terence Shaw
To: Tom Dalton


<warbetty@sympatico.ca> Cc: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:12 AM Subject: Re: [CR]Track ENDS/Nutted Fasteners


> on 3/28/02 6:37 AM, Tom Dalton at tom_s_dalton@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >
> > And now mine...
> > Whatever Curt Harnett and Marty Nothstein prefer is probably based on the
> > established standards for track racing. I may be totally wrong on this one
> > (really) but I have the impression that QR skewers, properly adjusted, exert
> > more force on the dropout face than track axle nuts, properly torqued. This
> > may just be some theoretical gibberish based on thread pitches and cam
> > profiles that totally breaks down becasue it doesn't account for various
> > frictional forces, the area of contact between fastener and frame and so on,
> > but I have read (in more than oine place) that QRs grip better. As I recall,
> > this discussion was always in the context of arguements surrounding yet
> > another QR product liability suit. In any event, I can see where elastic
> > deformation of the skewer itself may be significant enough to cause a wheel to
> > let go under extreme loads. But, while Marty may exert three (okay, five)
> > times the force on the pedal that the rest of us do, I'll speculate that many
> > of us are just as likely as he is to pull a wheel due to the extreme loads
> > allowed by the 24x32 gearing on our touring bikes.
> > Tom Dalton
> > Bethlehem, PA
> > Warren & Elizabeth <warbetty@sympatico.ca> wrote: My turn to speculate...
> >
> > First, they are track ends, not dropouts. Nutted axles are perceived to be
> > stronger than quick release although there appear to many riders who say
> > QR's are sufficient. Try selling that to Curt Harnett and Marty Nothstein.
> >
> > CR content...on many of the older fixed road bikes , axle retainers were
> > used in conjunction with track ends, providing the ultimate in wheel
> > security. They also make chain tension and wheel alignment a cinch. Yes
> > they are a pain when changing a flat but who thinks about that when they go
> > out for a ride.
> >
> > Warren Young
> > Toronto
> >
> >
> >
> > A follow up to the drop out question.
> >>
> >> Why are the wheels on fixed gear/track bicycles
> >> attached with nutted fasteners rather than quick release type skewers used
> >> on road bicycles?
> >>
> >> Track/Fixed gear rear wheel attachment seems to be distinctly different
> >> from a road,but the front seems to be the same.
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Classicrendezvous mailing list
> > Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> > http://www.bikelist.org/mailman/listinfo/classicren
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Movies - coverage of the 74th Academy Awards?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Classicrendezvous mailing list
> > Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> > http://www.bikelist.org/mailman/listinfo/classicrendezvous
> All- I agree, a quality quick release in the locked position both more
> convienient and more(I firmly belive) secure than an axle nut. Years ago I
> ran my touring bike with Campy track axles. The nuts (especially on the
> front) continually vibrated loose. However as an experienced track rider
> I've bounced my front wheel off of too many competitors bikes during races
> that I would relish a fat target like a QR lever. QR end loads high enough
> to secure the wheel distort the hollow axle enough to bind the hub. Try
> mounting a bare QR hub (sans spokes/rim) in a frame and close the quick
> release. Unless the hub is adjusted with side play it will bind. It has to
> be worse when the rider is sitting on the bike. To a trackie the smoother
> running traditional track set up (imagined or real) is faster.
> My very classic 1975 Holdsworth Pro Sprint now used only as a road fix
> gear has non traditional quick release...who wants to carry a "peanut
> butter" wrench!
> T. Shaw
> Santa Clara, California
>
> _______________________________________________
> Classicrendezvous mailing list
> Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> http://www.bikelist.org/mailman/listinfo/classicrendezvous

_________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com