Re: [CR]Re: Debunking time again


Example: Framebuilders:Masi

Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 19:42:24 -0600
Subject: Re: [CR]Re: Debunking time again
From: "Steven L. Sheffield" <stevens@veloworks.com>
To: Classic Rendezvous <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020530.175917.-148969.14.richardsachs@juno.com>


With all the people trying to date their bikes and talking about bike porn, stripping frames, etc., it was just a matter of time before the bike pimps showed up.

on 05/30/2002 03:59 PM, Richard M Sachs at richardsachs@juno.com wrote:
> this doesn't merit an answer.
> but since i was asked,
> my reply is in CAPS below.
> e-RICHIE
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> On Thu, 30 May 2002 13:49:34 -0700 (PDT) David Van Hook
> <dvanhook@yahoo.com> writes:
>> OK, I can't resist...
>> Material Boy writes:
>> <the consumers
>> are buying sex. they're buying an image of
>> what_they_can_be if they
>> ride the latest and greatest>
>>
>> Hmmm...so, Richard, does that make you a,
>> "bike-pimp"?
> NO. IT DOESNT
>> And if I have a bike that is my, "beater", does
>> that make me some kind of "bike-pervert"?
> NO. IT DOESN'T
>> Dave Van Hook
>> "Heavy breathing" in Hershey