Re: [CR]Early Campy Record crank on ebay: new high?

(Example: Production Builders:Cinelli)

Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2002 09:11:15 +0100
Subject: Re: [CR]Early Campy Record crank on ebay: new high?
From: "Hilary Stone" <hilary.stone@blueyonder.co.uk>
To: <NortonMarg@aol.com>, <Wdgadd@aol.com>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
In-Reply-To: <72.1d341c33.2a297c55@aol.com>


No this RH crank has not been specially machined or filed. A few weeks ago I sold a first pattern Campag right hand crank which was exactly the same and I also have another here now, all three are identical. The practice of filing cranks in the UK was unknown - although Campag cranks were known to break they almost always broke at the pedal eye.

regards

Hilary Stone, Bristol, England


> In a message dated 5/31/02 5:46:15 PM Pacific Daylight Time, Wdgadd@aol.com
> writes:
>
> << http://ebay.com/<blah>
>
> I never realized that the early cranks had this different arm/spider
> interface. Was this design weaker, stronger? Probably more difficult to
> produce. >> Stevan Thomas wrote:
> It's been machined or filed away to eliminate "the crack". Notice the file
> marks.
>
> In a message dated 5/31/02 5:46:15 PM Pacific Daylight Time, Wdgadd@aol.com
> writes:
>
> << http://ebay.com/<blah>
>
> I never realized that the early cranks had this different arm/spider
> interface. Was this design weaker, stronger? Probably more difficult to
> produce. >>
> It's been machined or filed away to eliminate "the crack". Notice the file
> marks.
> Stevan Thomas
> Alameda, CA