Re: [CR]Pencil Stays / Why?

(Example: Production Builders)

From: =?iso-8859-1?B?qAk=?= <Sterling@tns.net>
To: <Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
Cc: <Philcycles@aol.com>
References: <d4.19e4842d.2a5c9362@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Pencil Stays / Why?
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:56:14 -0700


Phil , I would argue that the thinner stays are more flexable than the fatter stays and therefore the ride will be a little softer. Certainly if anything you may notice more flex at the Bottom Bracket.
   Sterling Peters
   68 degrees ; marine layer
   Downtown San Diego


----- Original Message -----
From: Philcycles@aol.com
To: sgpnet@earthlink.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: [CR]Pencil Stays / Why?



>
> In a message dated 7/9/2 3:41:59 PM, sgpnet@earthlink.net writes:
>
> >Just took a ride on my 1950 Hetchins (non-curly) with 4 speed Sturmey
> >
> >and admired the long and lanky thin pencil stays.
> >
> >
> >
> >Since I know less than nothing about frame building, I'd like to know
> >
> >more about this kind of style stay..
> >
> >
> >
> >why thin?
> >
> >purely aesthetics?
> >
> >ride quality difference?
> >
> >
> >
> >anything else?
> >
> Nuymber 2. The seat stays are very lightly loaded.
> Phil Brown
> In sweltering NoHo, Ca