FW: [CR] Early SR lever shape, really, hallucinating

(Example: History:Norris Lockley)

Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 20:29:11 -0700
From: "Jim Merz" <jimmerz@qwest.net>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: FW: [CR] Early SR lever shape, really, hallucinating


Pretty funny this whole thing. I have no proof, but I am sure they had a different lever shape in the first SR parts.

Jim Merz Bainbridge Is. WA

-----Original Message----- From: classicrendezvous-admin@bikelist.org [mailto:classicrendezvous-admin@bikelist.org] On Behalf Of GPVB1@cs.com Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 7:40 PM To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org Subject: Re: [CR] Early SR lever shape, really, hallucinating

Tom:

The brake lever reach change probably occurred way before the 1977 CPSC-mandated changes. What makes you think it was part of those changes? It was done to make the lever easier to reach....

On the Benotto catalog jpeg in question, it's really difficult to see it

either way, but it looks to me like those are early NR levers with black dots drawn on them to make them look like SR levers (note the size/shading difference between the dots on the left-hand lever and the right-hand one).

Again, catalog pics. don't always represent reality. Have you ever seen a catalog shot of a car where the "crease" of the sheetmetal has been highlighted with an airbrush or, more recently, digital techniques? It really surprised me the first time a designer pointed it out clearly to me...

Still need to see a real one to believe there's a Loch Ness monster....

Anyone have any long-reach SR brake levers for sale?

Greg Parker A2 MI USA

Tom D. wrote:
> First gen. SR brake lever naysayers:
>
> Take a look at the levers on this here Bee-notta
>
> ftp://ftp.bates-lee.org/pub/benotto%232/4.jpg
>
> Do they really look like normal SR levers to you? They sure look like
> early, pre-CPSC Record levers to me, but with holes. Given that this is a
> very early SR bike, and obviously predates the CPSC changes that lead to
> the second Record lever shape, I'd say that SR levers were changed in the
> same manner. Up to 1977 they were a bit more swoopy and pointy, and sat at
> a different angle due to the big difference at the top. Why do we see so
> few of these? Good question.