Re: [CR]Bike Ethics 101

(Example: Bike Shops:R.E.W. Reynolds)

Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 14:50:36 -0400
From: <wspokes@penn.com>
To: Art Smith <ahsmith49@cox.net>
Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]Bike Ethics 101

Hi Art and all

Interesting question! There is a statement in the content below which disturbs me, a little. I try not let anyone rent any space in my head. Whether it is a $5 or a $500, if you are aware it is bent, just state the facts. There is not mystery in that logic. If I were to buy a bike at $5, I would probably already suspect something was wrong but I would darn well expect that person to fess up. And it would get me also wondering where would the seller or the LBS draw the line? $50, $100?? At what point is it worth it for them to tell the truth? If there would be any hesitation in the answer, I would doubt their integrity. I try to describe things honestly. ex. the crank arms are structurally sound but this sucker is scratched up bad. not described as "shop worn". I got a "shop worn" frame once and let me tell you, the guy was lucky I didn't hand deliver it back to him through the front window of the shop!! If something is different when an item arrives as compared with how i described it, I didn't understand it was supposed to be like that or I didn't have the knowledge but mostly I would even let people know I didn't know for sure. I would expect the same in return. I wouldn't assume a Bill Clinton policy on this one of "don't ask, don't tell" nor would I assume a GW Bush policy of flat out lying. I would expect similar treatment in return. Interesting question, should have some interesting responses.

Walter Skrzypek Falls Creek, Pa http://www.fallscreekoutdoorgear.com

On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 11:32:10 -0700 Art Smith <ahsmith49@cox.net> wrote:

Previous discussions about replicas etc. got me to thinking about what's involved and expected as appropriate disclosure when buying and selling vintage bikes. I operate under the idea that as a buyer, it's my responsiblity to check, inspect, ask appropriate questions, etc. about a bike before I buy it. If I miss something, mismatched parts, dings, etc. it seems that I can't blame the seller. If I ask a specific question I expect an honest answer. I'm pretty clear about what it takes from a buyer's perspective. The seller's position is not as clear to me. Throwing this question around some old timers at my LBS this was the final wrap up. Let's say I know a frame is slightly bent. As a seller what is my reponsibility to a buyer? The conclusion was that if it's a $500 bike you tell the seller. If it's a $5 bike you don't. I get the point here, but it's still not very clear. E-bay compounds the problem because you really can't see what you're buying and have to trust, at times blindly, the seller. So what do you think. Is it buyer beware? If there is a structural problem to you offer that info...on e-bay and at live sales like swaps? Do you tell the buyer if the parts aren't original whether you're asked or not? I'm curious. I've sold stuff in person and felt comfortable about it, but have avoided e-bay because I haven't felt like I could verbally describe a bike in the same way a potential buyer could inspect it. Especially if it is high dollar. Any horror stories either way on this subject?

Art Smith Thinking about a fixed gear/track bike and open to any opinions off line Phoenix