Re: [CR]Simplex LJ vs Huret Jubilee

(Example: Framebuilders:Cecil Behringer)

From: Jerry & Liz Moos <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
To: "Eric Elman" <tr4play@cox.net>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <CATFOODlKn4ZHkRQq5x00000b17@catfood.nt.phred.org> <000401c23840$a54a0830$6400a8c0@bourke> <003e01c238b1$0ce81b60$c86ae43f@tinypc> <000401c238b5$96c9aa70$241b0e44@elman1>
Subject: Re: [CR]Simplex LJ vs Huret Jubilee
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 20:43:03 -0500


I think the Jubilee, when in good condition, shifts as well as the SLJ, that is to say, a lot better than Campy. But they are very light and pretty fragile, and I doubt the Jubilee would be as durable as the Campy or SLJ, and would be much more easily damaged in even a minor crash. I do have a Jubilee on a Motobecane Le Champion (a very unusual example with the Grand Record paint scheme and very long brake reach). So I can testify to the good shifting, but haven't put enough miles on it to verify my opinion about the lesser durability.

Regards,

Jerry Moos


----- Original Message -----
From: Eric Elman
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:13 PM
Subject: [CR]Simplex LJ vs Huret Jubilee



> I have lots of miles and experience with the Simplex Super LJ derailleurs
> and consider them to be among the best shifting and durable (remember these
> are the all metal ones) from the 70's and early 80's. I happen to like them
> more then Campagnolo NR which I have on a few of my bikes as well. I've
> never used a Huret Jubilee and am curious how they compare. Certainly they
> weigh less as that is what they were known for, but how are they shifting
> and durability wise?

>

> Eric Elman

> Somers, CT