Re: [CR]WTB: Seeking Campy NR Triple BB

(Example: History:Ted Ernst)

From: "Steve Neago" <questor@cinci.rr.com>
To: "Mark Bulgier" <mark@bulgier.net>
Cc: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <C102531FB711D411B5B90060B0A468760DADEE@mail.bulgier.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]WTB: Seeking Campy NR Triple BB
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 15:21:20 -0400


Hi Mark,

Thanks for the info, but please refer to the Campy 1982 catalogue Pg 32... it lists a "744/1 Triple chainring cotterless spindle" which uses the same cups as a NR spindle listed directly below the triple spindle.

Regards, Steve Neago
Cincinnati, OH


----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Bulgier
To: 'Steve Neago'
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 1:10 PM
Subject: RE: [CR]WTB: Seeking Campy NR Triple BB



>
> Steve Neago writes:
> >
> > I am trying to find a decent Campy Triple BB for a post 1978
> > crank set. The length of the axle must exceed 121mm...
>
> Bicycle Classics lists them at http://www.bicycleclassics.com/bottom.html
>
> Strictly speaking, what you need is a Record BB, not Nuovo. Nuovo Record
> BBs were like the earlier Record except for the thicker cups with the
> "knurled" or "rifled" opening for the axle, and the axles have the cones set
> narrower due to the thick cups. Campy never made a NR triple, same with
> track - Record only.
>
> (Maybe you knew all this; a lot of people say NR when they mean old Record
> to avoid confusion with the newer version of Record.)
>
> So you need an old Record triple axle and a pair of Record (thin) cups.
>
> If other brands will do, you have lots of choices, but be sure to get a
> heavily asymmetrical axle, longer on the right. Most axles in that length
> nowadays (since maybe '85?) are symmetrical, and thus won't be long enough
> on the right. They will also put your left crank out in left field, which
> will work but looks dumb!
>
> Again, apologies for the lecture if you already knew all this.

>

> Mark Bulgier

> Seattle, Wa

> USA