Re: [CR]NOW: B.15 question WAS: Brooks B-17 question

(Example: Framebuilders:Brian Baylis)

From: "Raoul Delmare" <R.Delmare@Charter.net>
To: <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <f4.27c3b0c0.2b58fbab@aol.com> <003601c2be39$edba0640$7b257044@nebi.com> <3E282D4B.28E3766A@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]NOW: B.15 question WAS: Brooks B-17 question
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:38:58 -0600


Thanks Chuck .

Follow up question - what about the steel frame ?

Same frame ? Didn't the B.15 have different saddle bag loops ?

Or am I just looking at B.15 saddles from one era , and B.17 saddles from another era ? Were the saddle bag loops the same on both the .15 and the .17 , during any one particular year ? Or was there really a basic style difference between the two ?

Overall saddle width & length the same ?

Raoul Delmare
Marysville Kansas


----- Original Message -----
From: Chuck Schmidt
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 10:20 AM
Subject: [CR]NOW: B.15 question WAS: Brooks B-17 question



> Raoul Delmare wrote:
> >
> (cut)
> > Now then , would someone please explain to me , the relationship of the
> > Brooks B.15 Saddle , with all of that stuff I wrote , up above ?!?!
>
>
> The leather of the B.17 is cut from a better part of the cow's hide than
> the B.15. Brooks describes the B.17's leather as "select butt".
>
> Since the B.15 is cut from a lesser quality part of the hide, the
> leather can (not always) be thinner than on a B.17.
>
> To clarify: Both would be cut from the same hide but the B.17 would be
> from the better part of the same hide.

>

> Chuck Schmidt

> SoPas, So Cal

>

> .