[CR]Re: Classicrendezvous Digest, Vol 3, Issue 14

(Example: Production Builders:Tonard)

From: "Stephen Barner" <steve@sburl.com>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <CATFOODgJKVApwOLZCH000000ef@catfood.nt.phred.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 20:16:56 -0500
Subject: [CR]Re: Classicrendezvous Digest, Vol 3, Issue 14

I recall a Campy NR front that had pivot pins that had loosened up, but could not be pulled out. It was one of the earlier ones that did not have the bulge reinforcement in the casting. It seemed to me that the steel post must have a swaged end and the aluminum was cast around it.

Steve Barner, maybe I'll cut up an old derailleur to check it out, in Bolton, Vermont


----- Original Message -----


> Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:05:17 -0500
> From: "apgmaa@earthlink.net" <apgmaa@earthlink.net>
> To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> Subject: [CR]Old, Non anodized Campy FDs vs Modern Anodized FDs
> Message-ID: <99610-2200331319517630@M2W053.mail2web.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Precedence: list
> Reply-To: apgmaa@earthlink.net
> Message: 12
>
> All CRs:
>
> However, the modern Campy derailleurs have fully anodized bodies and pivot=
>
> arms, so obviously some improvement has been done in the design and/or
> assembly process=2E Because there is an allen keying on the back of the
> upper pivot pin for the Record derailleurs, it implies that the new front
> derailleurs have pins that screw in, while the old NR front derailleurs ma=
> y
> have pins that were pressed in=2E=20
>
> Does anybody know this for certain?
>
> Andrew Gillis (cold, gray, damp and pending rain in Long Beach, CA)