Re: [CR]Cinelli's are rough? - Who is making "rough" bikes thesedays?


Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 19:06:51 -0700
From: Chuck Schmidt <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]Cinelli's are rough? - Who is making "rough" bikes thesedays?
References: <20030308.145048.-259559.19.richardsachs@juno.com> <002901c2e5e5$e2847c00$6b0985cd@hppav>


Richard Rose wrote:
>
> e-chuckie wrote, in part:
>
> > Maybe I wasn't clear enough.
> >
> > The relatively few guys in the market for a custom steel lug'd bike
> > probably don't know (or care for that matter) that their prospective
> > frame has investment cast lugs or not; probably can't appreciate the
> > difference without an explanation.
>
> Why do we assume so little from the "average" guy in the market. What makes
> us so smart? Your statement assumes an awfull lot Chuck.
> Richard (gee, I thought it was a handjob) Rose. (Toledo, Ohio)
> BTW, a tough 50 miler today on the PX-10 fixie.

Ahhhh, Richard, no where did I say "we". And I am making no assumptions. Why do I expect so little from the "average" guy in the market? My experience?

Chuck (I'm only speaking for myself) Schmidt L.A. BTW, an easy 60 miler on the Waterford fixed

.