RE: [CR]frame size (now sneakers)


From: "Richard Rose" <rmrose@toast.net>
To: "'joe starck'" <joestarck2003@yahoo.com>, "'Grant McLean'" <Grant.McLean@SportingLife.ca>
Subject: RE: [CR]frame size (now sneakers)
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:07:17 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20030327204327.47126.qmail@web20512.mail.yahoo.com>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

Joe / Grant / e-richie, Grant does sort of address what I was wondering about, in response to your query. The pedaling style thing would seem to have a greater bearing on proper fit than actual size of ones foot? Hey, I am not debating the validity of anything here. If e-richie says size of foot is important I believe it. I am just curious about the intricacies. Richard Rose (Toledo, Ohio)

-----Original Message----- From: classicrendezvous-bounces@bikelist.org [mailto:classicrendezvous-bounces@bikelist.org] On Behalf Of joe starck Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 3:43 PM To: Grant McLean Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org Subject: RE: [CR]frame size (now sneakers)

Grant- Actully, my "foot thought experiment" was directed to Richard Rose as a credible response to his question about frame size. And as I responded to another CR member earlier, "Foot size is often a wash, I guess you could call it a dynamic consideration, because for the same reason the cycler changes hand positions on a ride, he often ankles differently, as in heels first up hills and such." Joe Starck, Sun Prairie, Wisconsin Grant McLean <Grant.McLean@SportingLife.ca> wrote: List,

Aparently, Richie would change into a differnt size "Puma" sneaker!! Check out all the puma action at http://tinyurl.com/8a8q rogaine

Style-master indeed!! All the puma-wearin' cats were down in "e" richie's hood!!

Grant McLean i love it when the threads come together! Toronto.Ca

Joe Asked E-Richie: How 'bout a thought experiment? If you had bigger or smaller feet, what would you change?