Re: [CR]On the idea of imitatation

(Example: Framebuilders)

From: "Tom Martin" <tom@wilsonbike.com>
To: "eric" <epzamora@earthlink.net>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <BACE3E73.6948%epzamora@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]On the idea of imitatation
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 08:29:07 -0700


Of course the stones were imitators. They homogenized R and B and rock n roll to a largely white audience. They happened to be in the right place in the right time. Keith Richards et al is quite talented and pop culture forgave them for ripping off the old masters and bestowed them as 'originators' of their own style of hand.

Tom getting off topic Martin


----- Original Message -----
From: eric
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Friday, April 25, 2003 1:22 AM
Subject: Re: [CR]On the idea of imitatation



>
>
> > From: classicrendezvous-request@bikelist.org
> > Reply-To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> > Date: 24 Apr 2003 12:06:02 -0700
> > To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> > Subject: Classicrendezvous Digest, Vol 4, Issue 84
> >
> > [CR]On the idea of imitatation
>
> Tom Sanders wrote:
>
> : Are the Rolling Stones mere imitators =
> of Little Richard. Hell no!"
>
> well, actually, i think the Stones were more like Chuck Berry than that wild
> man Little Richard ;-)
>
> (kinda on-topic)
>
>
> eric zamora
> fresno, ca.