Re: [CR]Funkmeister Sachs (was Re: Ted Williams is...was---

(Example: Framebuilding:Technology)

From: <ABikie@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 21:32:41 EDT
Subject: Re: [CR]Funkmeister Sachs (was Re: Ted Williams is...was---
To: kctommy@msn.com, sachs@erols.com, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org


In a message dated 5/6/2003 9:28:09 PM Eastern Daylight Time, kctommy@msn.com writes:
>
>
>
> Defiinetly a compliment Harv. Who loves ya babe? We've discovered the
> antidote to Mojo obsession, and it's Funk! Turning our back on sissy
> effete pedigree, we embrace the rare, rough edged machines that inspired us
> in our youth and generate fond recollections of former rides. Such bikes
> may not have roots in the Vigorelli, but they make us feel all warm inside
> when we see one again on the road. Hence my fondness for my otherwise run
> of the mill Trek, and my admiration for your Sears Teddy. You'll notice it
> got two pictures in my Yahoo photo album, eclipsing such boring perfect
> bikes like Dale's Ephgrave and Hurlow. Your Ted Williams defines "Funk".
>
>
> Anyone can spend big bucks to get a perfect bike, but there's sweat equity
> in a funky machine. Thanks for bringing her for us to admire.
>
> Tom (funked up, but not like Harvey) Adams, Shrewsbury NJ
>

wow, do we have a category/gasp, THEME? starting for next year?????

Might I have to recuse myself? Do I leave the 512 speed bridgrstone home?

Larry Black
Funkville, Md