[CR]Re: mystery frame 2

(Example: Framebuilders:Dario Pegoretti)

From: "Thomas Rawson" <twrawson@worldnet.att.net>
To: <Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>, <OROBOYZ@aol.com>
References: <f.114a622d.2bf3e5e4@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 12:53:03 -0700
Subject: [CR]Re: mystery frame 2

Dale, let me feed the discussion a little more. We have the latest "history" from Flash' website describing the riveted flat stock stack which was sawed and filed method of lug fabrication. Then in Hetchins catalog for 1956 there are two ECs one is "pattern lugs" the other "pressed steel" lugs. The "pattern lugs" cost more. AND I wonder if pattern lugs refers to the method Flash discovered. We dont know. In 1962 the EC is still available two ways "cast" or "pressed" - with cast being the more expensive.

When you used the term "mid term" were you talking about the different Periods (years) the EC was being made or were you talking about a step in the process of manufacture? It doesnt look like there was a progression from one process to the other, chronologically speaking, at least with the EC.

Tom Rawson
Oakland, CA


----- Original Message -----
From: OROBOYZ@aol.com
To: twrawson@worldnet.att.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: mystery frame 2



> In a message dated 5/14/2003 1:02:24 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> twrawson@worldnet.att.net writes:
>
> << "Looks like the mid-term, non-cast lug version."?
>
> And what do you mean by "mid term"? >>
>
> After cast....the seat post binder ears are not that super thick we see in
> the heavy cast versions.. and before Prugnat stamped and "sliced and diced"
>
> Dale Brown
> cycles de ORO, Inc.
> 1410 Mill Street
> Greensboro, North Carolina
> USA 27408
> 336-274-5959
> Fax 336-274-6360
> <A HREF="http://www.cyclesdeoro.com">cyclesdeORO.com</A>
> <A HREF="http://www.classicrendezvous.com/main.htm">Classic Rendezvous</A>