Re: [CR]victims of campy marketing

(Example: Framebuilders:Norman Taylor)

Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 20:14:04 -0700
Subject: Re: [CR]victims of campy marketing
To: chuckschmidt@earthlink.net
From: "Brandon Ives" <monkeylad@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <3ECC3CA3.2D7B15C2@earthlink.net>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

On Wednesday, May 21, 2003, at 07:57 PM, Chuck Schmidt wrote:
> Brandon Ives wrote:
>>
>> Well then Chuck let me ask this, what is more original and why; what's
>> in the catalog, what's in the box that the dealer gets, or what the
>> customer walks out with?
>
> Silly question, Monkeylad. None of the above. What is the "most
> original" is what is on the bike when it was new.

You're not answering the question. I made a statement to which you replied, "Correct" for what Brandon? Correct original? No. Correct for the period? No. Correct _of_ the period? Yes." Tell us what correct is since you seem to have the answer? I'm asking a straight-forward question and if you want to make it a semantic argument we can if you like, but that would be much more "silly" than just backing up your answers. Personally "correct" is the bike the customer is handed in my mind. enjoy, Brandon"monkeyman"Ives SB, CA ++++++++++++++++++ "Sine coffea nihil sum."
        --Sarah Vowell-- ++++++++++++++++++