Re: [CR]victims of campy marketing

(Example: Bike Shops:R.E.W. Reynolds)

Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 21:00:13 -0700
Subject: Re: [CR]victims of campy marketing
To: chuckschmidt@earthlink.net
From: "Brandon Ives" <monkeylad@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <3ECC4166.F4AFE81A@earthlink.net>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

On Wednesday, May 21, 2003, at 08:18 PM, Chuck Schmidt wrote:
> Jeeze Brandon! Chill out, Bro.

Sorry don't mean to come across too strong. I think we're all a little emotional today.
> I said, what the bike had when it was new.
> You said, the bike the customer is handed.
> Are these different answers??????????????????????????????

Many posts back I said that a customer putting A'ME or Modolo hoods on a new bike still made it original, you said "Correct original? No. Correct for the period? No." So yes they are different answers. People's quest for originality in general is a quest for the bike in the catalog picture. This takes the most important part out of the equation, the rider. I don't think a bike is really a bike until it has a rider. As one of the strongest proponents of the "ride it" side of the ride/don't ride debate I think you might agree. If when a bike is pulled from the box and the hubs are replaced with Hi-E's, the pulleys Bullseye, the saddle with Brooks, and the bar tape, cable housings, and toe straps with a different color. I argue that that bike is as original as the bike pictured in the catalog. Maybe it's just me and never finding a bike that was "just right" out of the box, but I think the individual touches a customer adds to the bike is what makes the bike something special. enjoy, Brandon"monkeyman"Ives I don't walk to a different drummer, I am a drummer in Santa Barbara, Calif. ++++++++++++++++++ "Sine coffea nihil sum."
        --Sarah Vowell-- ++++++++++++++++++