Re: [CR]Rear hub spacing 110 vs. 120


Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 18:02:58 +1200
From: David Benson <david@worrall.co.nz>
To: NortonMarg@aol.com
Subject: Re: [CR]Rear hub spacing 110 vs. 120
References: <ea.39cbc59b.2c1759c5@aol.com>
cc: mail@woodworkingboy.com
cc: mail@woodworkingboy.com

Stevan Thomas wrote:
>My Campagnolo #14 Catalogue (1960) shows ONLY 110 for the rear. If anyone has
>a catalogue #15 (1967) or #16 (1968), it would be interesting to see if both
>are listed.
> In the #16 Catalog, only 110mm track hubs are listed, however the Track Chain Line diagram shows both 110 & 120mm OLN dimensions. Furthermore, the catalog lists different BB spindles for 110 & 120mm OLN. Presumably 110mm OLN was considered the norm at the time, as the bottom bracket for 110mm was listed as the 'default' option.

I'm also curious as to whether Campagnolo changed the width of their rear track hub shell at some time- there does not seem to be any way to reduce the OLN width of any of my Record track hubs by a centimetre.

David Benson
Auckland, NZ