Re: [CR]Framebuilding blather

(Example: Component Manufacturers:Cinelli)

From: "Brian Baylis" <rocklube@adnc.com>
To: <brucerobbins@supanet.com>
References: <1066384399.brucerobbins@supanet.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Framebuilding blather
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 07:38:53 -0700
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

Bruce,

I would go for that. The "keepers" are a very small group anyway. They really are off topic unless it was built before 1983. I was active beginning in 1974 as far as bikes with my brand or name on them. Almost none of the "Keepers" who were building frames at that time are still building frames now that completely embody the principals we seek to study on this list. I'm comfortable with eliminating the "Keeper" thing if everyone else feels the same.

Brian Baylis La Mesa, CA Let me know what I need to do to aquire the "Wee Scot" for my collection.


----- Original Message -----
From: brucerobbins@supanet.com
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 2:53 AM
Subject: [CR]Framebuilding blather



>
> We could circumvent all this discussion about framebuilding (isn't there a
> list somewhere for this anyway) by restricting list topics to bikes built
> before 1983 and doing away with the "keepers of the flame" clause that gives
> rise to it all in the first place. Just a thought.
>

> Bruce

> Dundee

> Scotland

>

> --