[CR]Re: Changing the definitions of being on-topic


Example: Component Manufacturers

From: OROBOYZ@aol.com
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 10:53:57 EDT
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: [CR]Re: Changing the definitions of being on-topic

In a message dated Friday, October 17, 2003 2:53 AM, brucerobbins@supanet.com writes:

<< We could circumvent all this discussion about framebuilding (isn't there a list somewhere for this anyway) by restricting list topics to bikes built before 1983 and doing away with the "keepers of the flame" clause that gives rise to it all in the first place.>>

In a message dated 10/17/2003 10:39:09 AM Eastern Daylight Time, rocklube@adnc.com writes:

<< I would go for that. The "keepers" are a very small group anyway. They really are off topic unless it was built before 1983. .............. I'm comfortable with eliminating the "Keeper" thing if everyone else feels the same.
>>

Sorry guys, but one of my greatest pleasures and almost duties is to support and include Keeper's of the Flame here in the CR. I can take a little flare up now and then if necessary and those who cannot abide reading about those topics may get some good exercise, that of the old delete button.... Ha!

Dale Brown Obstinate and unyielding list owner Potentate Greensboro, North Carolina