Re: [CR]Please don't bend Universal brakes.

(Example: Events:Cirque du Cyclisme:2002)

From: <Bikerdaver@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:15:03 EST
Subject: Re: [CR]Please don't bend Universal brakes.
To: sachs@erols.com, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org, heine93@earthlink.net


I might be missing some thing, but have you tried to just put in another spacer washer, or two, just to get the calipers moved farther away from the seat-stays? cheers Dave Anderson Cut Bank--how many ways can you say very COLD?--MT

In a message dated 12/15/2003 3:16:20 PM PST, sachs@erols.com writes: Jan Heine wrote: I have a Universal rear brake, the sidepull with the extra arm. When I mount it on the bike, the pads interfere with the seat stays. Checking images of Universal-braked bikes, it appears that the arms are bent slightly to provide clearance. Before I start bending - is this correct? <snip> ---------------------------- Do as you wish, but in my experience bending Universal caliper arms (or twisting to get proper toe-in) is a sure-fire way to get a much shorter arm, with no brake mounting flat. Unlike most others, the ones I know (particularly the 61s) just snap when bent. Not nice. I have no way to know if earlier models were a different alloy -- and I'm not going to test one!

If there is interference with the seat stays, in my experience it is usually the result of a larger brake bridge hole than the brake bolt, so the assembly rotates down. The right way to deal with this would be to insert a sleeve, but that requires machining.