Re: [CR]RE: the other...chainring

(Example: Humor)

From: "stevens" <stevens@veloworks.com>
To: NortonMarg@aol.com, lists@PeterWhiteCycles.com
Subject: Re: [CR]RE: the other...chainring
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:56:48 -0700
In-Reply-To: <15.1eebf419.2d134374@aol.com>
References: <15.1eebf419.2d134374@aol.com>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

You sure the ring wasn't bent???

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:52:52 EST, NortonMarg wrote
> In a message dated 12/17/03 8:14:25 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> lists@PeterWhiteCycles.com writes:
>
> > Sorry, but there is absolutely no truth to this. Although this myth has
> > been
> > around since Super Record rings were introduced, there is neither any
> > empirical evidence that this is true, nor any reason why it should be true.
> >
> > Any deflection you see in chainrings is from flexing of the seat tube
> > between the front derailleur and the BB shell, and flexing of the bottom
> > bracket axle. There are no lateral forces on chainrings, except during
> > shifts.
> >
>
> I beg to differ. Nobody told me this story, it's something I noticed
> (on a VERY stiff frame that I made) by looking down while pedaling.
> Back when I was pretty strong. Theoretically, you may be right, but
> what is empirical evidence if not seat-of-the-pants experience and observation?
> Stevan Thomas
> Alameda, CA
>
> _______________________________________________

--
Steven L. Sheffield
stevens at veloworks dot com
veloworks at worldnet dot ay tea tee dot net
bellum pax est libertas servitus est ignoratio vis est
ess ay ell tea ell ay kay ee sea aye tee why you ti ay aitch
aitch tee tea pea colon [for word] slash [four ward] slash double-you
double-yew double-ewe dot veloworks dot com [four word] slash