[CR]Re: FW: Chuck's Trolling Complaint

Example: Framebuilding:Tony Beek

To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 13:04:22 -0800
From: "Mark A. Perkins" <bicyclemark@juno.com>
Subject: [CR]Re: FW: Chuck's Trolling Complaint


You haven't read the messages he has sent me "off list". I have come up with a fine solution to the Chuckie virus that has infected my computer as of late, and I highly recommend others do the same. I have blocked all incoming mail from Mr. I-have-all-the-answers himself. Before I had to sign off the list because of a real computer virus a while back, I got to a point where I was deleting all of his messages before I continued with reading the good ones from the rest of you wonderful folks. The man (for lack of a more appropriate word at the moment), rarely contributes any valuable information to the CR list, so I am quite sure that I will not be missing anything. Except the crap he loves to dish out, but doesn't know how to take when it comes back at him. And how could I possibly miss that?

The rest of you have been absolutely wonderful, and I wish I could sit and talk classic bicycles with all of you forever, and share my collection of classic bicycles with everyone too.

Cheers everyone!

"Bicycle Mark" Perkins Fresno Cycling Club - Historian Fresno, California, U.S.A.

On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 12:43:05 -0500 "Bender-Zanoni, Joseph" <JBender-Zanoni@fishneave.com> writes:
> FYI,
> Joe
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bender-Zanoni, Joseph
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:38 AM
> To: 'oroboyz@aol.com'
> Subject: Chuck's Trolling Complaint
> Chuck is continually going from pontificating know-it-all to egg shell
> complainee, all the while cleverly dissembling. I haven't gotten any apology
> from him concerning trolling on me about the two speed deal, even as I
> explained how he had narrowed the topic then announced I was
> "WRONG".
> Know-it-all-ism, right/wrong stuff is a real detraction from the list and
> Chuck is always cleverly working the issue.
> Here he has dug out trolling by capitalizing one sentence in a detailed post
> from an experienced rider who just happens to disagree with him on his
> admitted oddball position. The development of supplesse and spin, road to
> track etc. is very complicated and subjective. And pushing the edge of
> suitable topics too boot. I could go on and on about riding my Frejus around
> New York with no brakes, skidding rear tires, how careful trackies are about
> gearing, riding a sub 13 second 200 at age 40 etc. but it's not about
> classic bikes.
> Sorry about the add on whining but I needed to vent.
> Joe
> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 23:55:41 -0700
> From: Chuck Schmidt <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
> To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> Subject: Re: [CR]Fixed gear gearing
> Message-ID: <3E781421.8B4FEDFF@earthlink.net>
> References: <20030318.232238.-254529.3.bicyclemark@juno.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Precedence: list
> Reply-To: chuckschmidt@earthlink.net
> Message: 2
> "Bicycle Mark" Perkins wrote:
> > (cut)
> > My point is that spinning is a good thing, especially when you really
> > learn how to do it right. And a track bike will help that happen better
> > than anything I know of. ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU DON'T USE A BRAKE. Just
> > MHO, but it worked and still works for me.
> Great troll, Bicycle Mark! (just my opinion, of course ;)
> Cheers everyone,
> Chuck Schmidt
> L.A.