RE: [CR]frame size


Example: Production Builders:Cinelli

From: "Richard Rose" <rmrose@toast.net>
To: "'Richard M Sachs'" <richardsachs@juno.com>
Subject: RE: [CR]frame size
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 14:27:14 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20030327.142724.-386605.12.richardsachs@juno.com>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

Sorry richie, I just thought your original post was a little funny, though insightful. I should have fought the urge to comment as it added nothing of value to the thread. But, when pushed for a question... How does foot size affect frame size / correct fit?

-----Original Message----- From: Richard M Sachs [mailto:richardsachs@juno.com] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 2:27 PM To: rmrose@toast.net Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org Subject: Re: [CR]frame size

R2 i'm not sure what the question is. it appears that you're asking about what's "more important" versus what's "less important". if all similarly sized pre-built frames were similarly configured, there might be a pat answer to this. all frames are measured differently, so one 58cm might 'work' for a guy with size 9's and another may not. e-RICHIE chester, ct

On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 13:39:29 -0500 "Richard Rose" <rmrose@toast.net> writes:
>
>
>
> snipped:
> "Richard Rose" <rmrose@toast.net> writes:
> "I assume that only unusually short or long feet would
> cause an otherwise "normal" frame size / saddle height
> to not be correct?"
>
> To which e-richie replied:
> Snipped:
> what's "normal"?
> you mean a pre-built frame made to cookie cutter
> dimension, one firm's 58cm bearing little resemblence
> to the one from the next village?!
>
> Well, yes. That is exactly what I was talking about.
> Richard Rose (not a doubting Thomas, just curious)
> Toledo, Ohio - Size 9