[CR]Re: The 1983 date for CR list


Example: Production Builders

From: "Stephen Barner" <steve@sburl.com>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <CATFOODMlW8caA85r4X0000436f@catfood.nt.phred.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 20:56:53 -0400
Subject: [CR]Re: The 1983 date for CR list

How about keeping the cutoff at the last year bikes were marketed with Campagnolo SR components? That seems a logical place to draw the line for the next 10 or 20 years. If that was '83, then I say keep it there. I honestly don't recall.

Steve Barner, Bolton, Vermont


----- Original Message -----


> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 19:29:57 EDT
> From: OROBOYZ@aol.com
> To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> Subject: Re: [CR]The 1983 date for CR list
> Message-ID: <1de.9aed708.2c0d37f5@aol.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Precedence: list
> Message: 12
>
> This discussion has reminded me of the battle I am personally having about
> the 20 year cutoff or rolling the CR date forward each year... Yes, it would
> eventually embrace some pretty odd/cool stuff like "C-Record" but it also would
> be forced to include stuff that is totally opposite the velo-appeal we (mostly)
> agree upon.
>
> Therefore, despite previous thoughts, I am strongly inclined to freeze the CR
> cut off at 1983!
>
> Seeing as how y'all are friends hanging out my garage, what do you think? I
> promise to listen but not necessarily take your advice! <g>
>
> Dale
>
> Dale Brown
> cycles de ORO, Inc.
> 1410 Mill Street
> Greensboro, North Carolina 27408
> 336-274-5959
> fax 336-274-6360
> <A HREF="http://www.cyclesdeoro.com">cyclesdeORO.com</A>
> <A HREF="http://www.classicrendezvous.com./main.htm">ClassicRendezvous.com</A>
>
> ------------------------------