Re: [CR]regardin matteo s masi

(Example: History)

Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2003 23:26:19 -0700
From: "Brian Baylis" <>
Subject: Re: [CR]regardin matteo s masi
References: <>


That would be one approach, although it may take time and more bikes to verify what may be stated. If someone were to ask for clarification from Alberto, it would be wise to prepare a list of relevent questions and seek LARGE amounts of details in the questioning. When, where, EXACTLY how he did EVERYTHING, how many, why, and on and on. Otherwise if asked just a simple question you will probably get a basic "it's like I said before" answer. We need details and supporting information so in the end it will be perfectly clear what is meant. Like I said, we did discussed this before and we basicalliy got nowhere in clearing up. If someone wants some questions to ask, I'll supply some.

Brian Baylis La Mesa, CA

> In a message dated 6/7/03 12:21:41 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> writes:
> What I can say is that I believe the odds are heavily in
> favor of that
> frame NOT having been built by Faliero himself. I would say
> that the
> odds are heavily in favor of the probability that the frame
> was
> "commissioned" by Faliero for the purpose of selling to
> someone in
> particular as a "favor" from Faliero.
> I think this can be cleared up by asking Alberto for "clarification".
> Stevan Thomas
> Alameda, CA