Re: [CR]Cinelli Unicanitor saddle

(Example: Framebuilding:Paint)

From: "jerrymoos" <jerrymoos@sbcglobal.net>
To: "wayofftheback" <wayofftheback@yahoo.com>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <20030926195717.54240.qmail@web20108.mail.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Cinelli Unicanitor saddle
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 19:07:40 -0500


I think that the trendy riders shifted to new saddles with fancier shapes, Ti rails, gel inserts and cutouts, partly becuase of the overblown hype about impotence. Meanwhile the traditionalists decided that a well broken Brooks was more comfortable and worth the extra weight.

Regards,

Jerry Moos
Houston, TX


----- Original Message -----
From: wayofftheback
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 2:57 PM
Subject: [CR]Cinelli Unicanitor saddle



> I am curious as to what caused the decline of
> popularity of Cinelli saddles. Bad marketing?
> Cheaper competition? In the mid-70s, they seemed to
> be saddle to have. By the mid-80s, they seemed to be
> an also-ran.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> =====
> John Taglia
> Chicago, Illinois
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
> http://shopping.yahoo.com