Re: [CR]Conserving 30-year old bikes

(Example: Framebuilders:Brian Baylis)

From: <CMontgo945@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 23:41:06 EST
Subject: Re: [CR]Conserving 30-year old bikes
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org



> In my opinion, old bikes should be ridden.
> A bike that is 30 years old and does not need restoration has not been
> ridden enough.
> A good steel frame can last 100 years, so if you're not going to
> restore it 3x times, then you're mistreating your ride - either by
> neglecting to ride it enough, or neglecting to restore it when it gets
> rusty and/or unprotected.
> probably these views are controversial, but they are mine and i do not
> believe in forcing them upon others.
> - Don Gillies
> San Diego, CA
> Well thank you Don. I was having misgivings, as an earlier post of mine discussed, about turning my 60 year old (that's 2x30) Bates into a commute/tour bike. Instead of decorating it with period goodies I'm going to outfit it with vintage but tough, functional, and comfortable components and ride the bejeezus out of it. So any of you hardliners, if you see me, don't throw rocks. Or laugh for that matter.

Craig in Tucson