Re: [CR]New USPS surcharge?

(Example: History:Norris Lockley)

From: "Tom Martin" <tom@wilsonbike.com>
To: <ABikie@aol.com>, <GPVB1@cs.com>
References: <3c.3bcc4857.2d7526ff@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]New USPS surcharge?
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 16:14:12 -0800
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

US Postal finally adjusted their pricing similar to UPS. They gotta pay for Lance somehow- I doubt it is coming from $0.37 stamps. After a bit of reaseach with the other biggies (UPS, FedEx, DHL, RPS, etc) you will find they all generally structure their pricing schedules in the same way. There is the normal gouge rate, then there is the Oversize gouge rate. Your rebate will come in the form of a dividend check when you buy their stock I guess.

Tom Martin
Oakland CA


----- Original Message -----
From: ABikie@aol.com
To: GPVB1@cs.com
Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 3:53 PM
Subject: Re: [CR]New USPS surcharge?



> In a message dated 3/1/04 6:48:57 PM Eastern Standard Time, GPVB1@cs.com
> writes:
> one (at least to me):
>
> I shipped some NOS rims domestically via Priority Mail today. They usually
> cost about $12 to send. Today, I was charged an additional $8.75 "your box is
> bigger than 84 inches in girth plus length, but it's under 14 pounds, so
> we're
> gonna ding you" surcharge. This is the first time I've encountered this one!
> They're getting creative....
>
> Should I switch to another carrier for rims, wheels and framesets that can be
> packed to under 112" but are 84" or greater?
>
> Greg Parker
> Ann Arbor, Michigan
> Why not get the package down to 80" or under?
> UPS charges you for 30# even for an empty box over 80"
> they charge for 70# if it's over 108"
>
> and if it's over 130, actual weight (min 70#) plus a $50 mandatory tip

>

> Larry Black

> Mt airy, Md