Re: [CR]Now: Coppi's height, Was: Rewriting history

(Example: Framebuilders:Chris Pauley)

From: <themaaslands@comcast.net>
To: Classicrendezvous@bikelist.org (Classic Rendezvous)
Subject: Re: [CR]Now: Coppi's height, Was: Rewriting history
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 17:34:45 +0000

Jan asked:
> How tall was Coppi, anyhow? I know he was tall - Steve Maaslands says
> Koblet and Coppi were the same height - but was he really THAT tall?

Coppi was variously stated as being 1m85-1m87! He too rode a 59 cm c/c frame. I own a De Rosa bike used by Roberto Conti for his 16th place finish in the Tour de France, he is 1m88 and it is a 56 cm c/c frame. According to Ugo De Rosa, most Americans who get a custom made frames end up with frames that are 2-3 cm smaller than what they are accustomed to. He says their general reaction is of disbelief until they take the bike out for a ride. They then never want to return to the larger frame size.

--
Steven Maasland
Moorestown, NJ

> According to Le Cycle (Aug. 4, 1951, quoted from VBQ vol. 2, No. 2),

> Koblet measured 186 cm. They don't say whether this is with socks or

> barefoot.

>

> His frame was a 59, assuming c-c. That is small! Maybe the largest

> stock frame La Perle made?

>

> (Toni Theilmeier reported that Koblet used a stock frame to win the

> Giro. That must have been the 1950 Giro, according to J-P Ollivier's

> book the only one he won, unless I overlooked something. So maybe he

> liked the stock bike, because one would assume that after a Giro win,

> he'd get a custom bike. Or maybe not. He was not the favorite for

> that Tour in 1951. Did racers have to buy their own frames back then,

> which they had relabeled as whatever they were supposed to ride, or

> did their sponsors pick up the tab? I suspect they had to pay

> themselves. Maybe some preferred to save their money and ride what

> they were given?)

>

> --

> Jan Heine, Seattle

> Editor/Publisher

> Vintage Bicycle Quarterly

> http://www.mindspring.com/~heine/bikesite/bikesite/