Re: [CR]What did Suntour components do incorrectly?

(Example: Bike Shops)

From: <Bikerdaver@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 00:59:54 EDT
Subject: Re: [CR]What did Suntour components do incorrectly?
To: joebz@optonline.net, bianchipan@yahoo.com, classicrendezvous@bikelist.org


In a message dated 5/19/2004 6:59:48 PM PST, joebz@optonline.net writes: Berto says that Suntour didn't charge enough. He thinks the price shaped the perception but I would say they probably needed to add $2 to every component and advertise like crazy.

My biggest criticism would be change for change's sake. After getting it right with parts like the VX, Cyclone and original Superbe they moved backward or stood still. Or they didn't make simple necessary changes like making the Cyclone rear convenient to install a cable. Intead they make a Cyclone II that is heavier and doesn't shift as well.

Joe Bender-Zanoni
Great Notch, NJ


----- Original Message -----
From: Harris
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 9:10 PM
Subject: [CR]What did Suntour components do incorrectly?


> Says it all,I read a post mentioning briefly that Suntour was out of favor with some listee's.I have always been stymied at how well the stuff worked.Cost considered they had no peer!IMHO.I have ridden and or own most.
> Harris Spracher
> Waynesboro,Va I am in agreement as all of my experiences with Suntour VX, Superbe products shifted smoothly and were as durible as anything on the market. Apparently they had some lower end stuff in the 90s that was recalled for defects and that
added to their death nell.
cheers-
Dave Anderson
Cut Bank MT