Re: [CR]Frame integrity

(Example: Framebuilders:Masi)

Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 14:21:14 -0400
From: "Peter Jon White" <lists@peterwhitecycles.com>
To: "richardsachs@juno.com" <richardsachs@juno.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Frame integrity
References: <20040721.092138.28268.30658@webmail29.nyc.untd.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040721.092138.28268.30658@webmail29.nyc.untd.com>
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

richardsachs@juno.com wrote:


> i feel differently.
> fork blades are designed in guage, taper, and overall length
> to be bent. chainstays are not.

Are you concerned about failure? Or is it an aesthetic issue? If it's failure, have you ever seen one fail as a result of cold setting? I haven't, and I've been doing it since the mid 70s, making 120 frames into 126mm for 6 speeds. I've been spreading old 120 frames to 135 for loaded touring since the late eighties without a single problem.

--
Peter Jon White
Peter White Cycles
24 Hall Rd.
Hillsborough, NH 03244
603 478 0900 Phone
603 478 0902 Phax
http://www.PeterWhiteCycles.com