Re: [CR]Originaliity is ..........


Example: Humor
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 14:13:03 -0700
From: "Doug Van Cleve" <dvancleve@gmail.com>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: [CR]Originaliity is ..........
In-Reply-To: <75d04b48040731135012895849@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BD2FBD11.477B%mail@woodworkingboy.com>


FWIW, Andy said (on the Framebuilders list) he isn't that thrilled with the way this particular frame came out and plans to do some redesign.

Doug Van Cleve Chandler, AZ where the weather is a bit warm for yard work, but...

On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 13:50:32 -0700, Kurt Sperry <haxixe@gmail.com> wrote:
> The head tube treatment isn't IMO! And leaving the ends of the head
> tube unsupported like that, cantilevered away from the down and top
> tubes where the headset bearings are mounted looks a little suspect
> from a functional design perspective too. That said, the workmanship
> and finish appear outstanding.
>
> Kurt Sperry
> Bellingham WA
>
>
>
> Dennis Young <mail@woodworkingboy.com> wrote:
> > Original no doubt! ...... but it begs the question, attractive?
> >
> http://www.bikelugs.com/pacentigallery/strawberry_gallery/index.html