Re: [CR]More relevant Team Raleigh Info?

(Example: Racing:Wayne Stetina)

From: "Eric Elman" <tr4play@cox.net>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <092420042309.28995.4154A93100022018000071432200745672020E000A9C9D0A08@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [CR]More relevant Team Raleigh Info?
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:24:14 -0400
reply-type=original

Hi Mike,

Nice find, and at a pawn shop of all places.

My guess is that it the frame is 753 and the fork is 531 as the Ilkeston shop and G. O'Donovan would still have been in the early stages of pioneering the use of 753. Seems logical to me (being in manufacturing) that during such a phase, they may have numerous reasons to stick with 531 for the forks; even as simple as wanting to maintain the "look" that the public was accustomed to at that time, ie. full chromed forks.

Eric Elman
Somers, CT


----- Original Message -----
From: hersefan@comcast.net



> Hi folks,
> A friend yesterday bought a Team Raleigh SB159 at a pawn shop. It sounds
> a lot like the one that was discussed a few days back, and it has a chrome
> fork.
> The question is that it has a 26.6 seatpost which from past posts leaves
> me to believe its an early 753 frame with metric tubing. But team's with
> 753 according to a post a few days ago should not have been available with
> chrome.
> So - this one seems like the one on ebay which was claimed to have 753.
> Does this also sound like a 753 bike but perhaps Raleigh made some with
> chrome 531 forks? Or did they do the evil chrome deed on 753 anyway? What
> else would explain the 26.6 seatpost? It is a large frame (marked 62 I
> think) but that would explain a 27.0 or perhaps a 26.8 post, not a 26.6.
> Any input would be appreciated. If my question was answered previously I
> appologize as its been hard to keep up with all the posts out there.
> Thanks gang!
> Mike Kone in Boulder CO