RE: [CR]measuring ugliness

(Example: Framebuilding:Norris Lockley)

Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: [CR]measuring ugliness
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:17:13 +1100
Thread-Topic: [CR]measuring ugliness
Thread-Index: AcTG4aBn0oRFvzB5QVOZbAYIeXzLcwAAheoQ
From: <Suzy.Jackson@csiro.au>
To: <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>


Mark Stonich wrote:
> Why are many of us, myself included, impressed with intricate
> lugwork. Compared to simple, minimalist lugs they add nothing but weight,
> and to the time that the tubes are heated. Would someone who didn't
> understand the skill and tradition involved find them beautiful?

Whilst I love the look of lugs, I don't like overly intricate lugs. For me, the beauty has to have a function. Each piece of metal that I add to my frames must do something. Lugs that are overly fussy just don't get my juices going the same way as a lug that's neat, crisp and beautifully executed, and perhaps a little understated.

And I agree about TIG. Whilst TIG welds are eminently practical and purposeful, they have no soul.

Just my 0.02 pesos...

Regards,

Suzy Jackson
Sydney, Australia