Re: [CR]Vintage bicycles and tiers

(Example: Framebuilding:Paint)

From: "ternst" <ternst1@cox.net>
To: <LouDeeter@aol.com>, <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>
References: <2FBACD66.5258F58F.0269AA25@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Vintage bicycles and tiers
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 22:57:47 -0800
reply-type=original

Good Points! Ted Ernst,Palos Verdes Est. CA


----- Original Message -----
From: LouDeeter@aol.com
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: [CR]Vintage bicycles and tiers



>I show literally thousands of makes and models of bicycles in the Used Bike
>Buyers Guide, many never having graced the pages of Classic Rendezvous.
>And, because most aren't discussed, they aren't considered "collectible",
>but they might be extremely rare. My point being that rarity and
>collectibility don't always go hand in hand. I don't know how many bikes
>that Brian Baylis, Peter Johnson, or Richard Moon have made, but I would
>guess that their bikes might be more rare than a Confente, yet not as
>collectible because they are still building and alive. It is an interesting
>exercise, but I sense a LOT of bandwidth to once again debate the relative
>merits of framebuilders, albeit with a somewhat more structured approach.
>Lou Deeter, Orlando FL