Re: Re: [CR] Campagnolo SR pulley bolts...

(Example: Framebuilding:Paint)

From: <gpvb1@comcast.net>
To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
Subject: Re: Re: [CR] Campagnolo SR pulley bolts...
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 16:27:30 +0000


Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 19:40:08 -0800 From: Chuck Schmidt <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net> To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org Subject: Re: [CR] Campagnolo SR pulley bolts...

gpvb1@comcast.net wrote:
>
> Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 14:17:05 -0800
> From: Chuck Schmidt <chuckschmidt@earthlink.net>
> To: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> Subject: Re: [CR] Campagnolo SR pulley bolts...
>
> Greg Parker wrote:
>
> 1978 was the transition year from first-generation to second-generation
> for the SR rear der.

==========================================================================
> To which e-Chuckie replied:
>
> I'd say the year of introduction of the 2nd generation of SR derailleur
> with script logo would be 1977 not 1978.
>
> Campagnolo Timeline http://www.velo-retro.com :
> 1977 Catalog #17a Supplement is printed for the year-end trade shows.
> Included are a revised Super Record derailleur with script logo and
> different cage geometry...

==========================================================================
> To which e-Gregie replied:
> Oooh - I'm 90% sure it was '78. Did you get any responses in the affirmative for '77 second-gen. ones?
> Although, it appears I was full of it regarding when the aluminum pivots and early-type cage went away (it was at least 1979, not 1978, it seems). Sorry all. My bad.

==========================================================================

To which e-Chuckissimo replied: I'm going with the year end trade show introduction date of 1977 until someone has info stating otherwise; what are you basing 1978 on?

Whether anyone on the CR list has a "Pat 77" 2nd generation SR derailleur or not matters not in the least; at least to me that is.

Chuck Schmidt South Pasadena, Southern California

Uh, then why did you ask about '77 rears? We've discussed umpteen times that Campy catalogs, which were cut-and-pasted from old art for decades, were often full of stronzini..... Basing your reality on old catalogs is generally not the best way to operate IMO. They are fun to look at, and can be great sources of information, but are certainly nowhere near definitive, particularly in the Campagnolo case. Reality trumps 'em every time. :-) Greg "parts is parts" Parker Ann Arbor, Michigan