Re: [CR]Re: Fork vs. Forks


Example: Framebuilding:Technology
From: "Raoul Delmare" <Raoul.L.Delmare@worldnet.att.net>
To: "C.R. List" <classicrendezvous@bikelist.org>, "Bruce C." <BruceCumberland@comcast.net>
References: <bb.3c5db7af.2d6c6d0a@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [CR]Re: Fork vs. Forks
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 06:33:52 -0600


ahhhhh . . .

Good one Martin .

I think the fork is actually the divide , and not either "leg" of the roads in question .

But still , people do talk that way , don't they ?

Raoul Delmare
Marysville Kansas


----- Original Message -----
From: REClassicBikes@aol.com
To: louiss@gate.net
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 3:02 AM
Subject: [CR]Re: Fork vs. Forks



> Interesting point Louis
>
> I would usually refer to the fork, as a "pair of Forks".
>
> However, I refer to the crown as a "fork crown".
>
> Whilst out cycling, if you come to a fork in the road and not knowing which
> way to go asked for directions, were told to take the left hand fork, would you
> still have two roads to choose from or just one?
>
> Regards
> Martin Coopland, Scotland, http://www.BatesBicycles.com