RE: [CR]Re: old stuff


Example: Events

From: "stevens" <stevens@veloworks.com>
To: "George Argiris" <George.Argiris@mitchell.com>, "Richard M Sachs" <richardsachs@juno.com>, <Grant.McLean@SportingLife.ca>
Subject: RE: [CR]Re: old stuff
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 09:31:55 -0700
In-Reply-To: <F96935FCB9C3D549B3B6CD8915811A2F07700538@mail60nt.mitchell.com>
References:
cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org

Since reliability and fuel efficiency is key, a 2004 Chevy ...

On Tue, 11 May 2004 08:15:43 -0700, George Argiris wrote
> Ya, what would you rather cruise in, a 2004 Chevy, or a 1957 Chevy?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: classicrendezvous-bounces@bikelist.org
> [mailto:classicrendezvous-bounces@bikelist.org] On Behalf Of Richard
> M Sachs Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 8:01 AM To: Grant.McLean@SportingLife.ca
> Cc: classicrendezvous@bikelist.org
> Subject: [CR]Re: old stuff
>
> i think you said what i said.
> e-RICHIE
> chester, ct
>
> On Tue, 11 May 2004 11:00:17 -0400 Grant McLean
> <Grant.McLean@SportingLife.ca> writes: Richard-san
>
> One reason I can think of to ride old stuff is that it's cool.
> Stuff that was the cat's ass 'back in the day' is still cool.
> Like those dudes at Goodwood who go racing vintage jaguars or
> ferrarii, although technologically 'obsolete' (thanks Chuck) they are
> still cool. Like those pumas you wore and the music
> Miles Davis played, that De Rosa Eddy rode was da bomb.
>
> It's got less to do with the fact that it's old, it has more to
> do with the fact that at the time it was made, you could do no
> better. Having the fine taste to recognize these achievements
> doesn't hurt one's reputation for coolness either...
>
> Grant McLean
> toronto, canada
>
>
>
> e-RICHIE aka Richard M Sachs of Chester, CT wrote:
>
> i can't think of a reason to use the old stuff - except
> that some of it is pretty.